As the NFL finally delivers to the world a LeBron-like free agent, common sense suggests Peyton Manning will not come within three football fields of signing with the New York Jets.Manning has spent ... Read full story
man i think we needit to let dAT $@%!$@ GO THAT IS GOOD AS MARK GET WE NEED TO GET MOSS DAT WILL OPEN UP A LOT OF PEOPLE ON THE TEAM WE NEED HIM THAT WILL GIVE US MORE RUNING GAME LOOK MORE $@%! WILL OPEN UP U NEED TO LISTEN REX IF U NO WHAT GOOOOOOOD FOR U 68 Days ago
bburwell00
You obviously failed elementary school. 161 Days ago
titletown35
Jets suck 68 Days ago
Carlitoeyy
@Linderella Slipper
How can you say Peyton had no receivers in Indy so it'd be the same in NY?
Manning to Harrison was one of the best duos in NFL history.
He had Wayne, Garcon, and Clark, more than Sanchez has with Plaxico and Holmes.
Sanchez has been lazy for the Jets cause he hasn't had ANYONE behind him to pose a threat to his spot. He gets paid, he starts, he could care less.
Put Peyton in NY and have fun with the NY rivalry.
69 Days ago
typhoonwins49
yes,if you keep sanchez yes maybe 2 0r 3 years he mite make it.the jets have to win now not 3 years from now .manning would instill something you can't put on paper.why arizona,why miami the jets our better then both those teams ,yes sign manning asap 69 Days ago
dea101983
please someone tell me this guy O'connor is not an NFL analyst. What is he watching. Sanchez should have been gone yesterday. Dont feed ppl that garbage. 69 Days ago
skoalbucks
hey O'Conner....I'm not a Jets fan....but Jets NOT going after Peyton would be huge mistake. Every time I watch Sanchez, I do not see a QB, but I just see a big pu$$y.....I'm sorry, I call it they way I see it. 69 Days ago
rscherwin
asinine argument Ian. Sanchez won because of those around him. Peyton won in spite of those around him. Just look at the record with and without Peyton. Do you believe Sanchez was a catalyst for the Jets playoff wins? Not to mention that if Peyton's even thinking about Miami, the Jets will have no hope of competing in the AFC East for the next 3 years. 69 Days ago
eml225
The Jets need to sign Matt Flynn and trade Sanchez to Seattle for a 1st round pick 69 Days ago
66DavePats1
A first rounder for Sanchez? More like a third, tops. 69 Days ago
Dominic_and_Cameron
Just put Revis in at QB 69 Days ago
suitman36
in my opinion, the jets should not persue peyton. to me, its too risky to sign a 36 year old qb who sat out the season due to an injury which he is one good hit away from having again.
i was not pleased with them signing favre either. the guy just was not what he was in his prime.
what the jets need to do now is to get a solid back up to sanchez....someone who will push him to do better, and be able to come in and play if sanchez falters. that was not the case with brunell.
some of you cite stats only when it benefits your argument. but, what else do you have to go by? statistically, sanchez at the present time, is about equal with favre and peyton at this point in their careers.
so, i say.....no thanks peyton. go play somewhere else. 69 Days ago
neuropharma
Jets should just pick him up to keep him away from the Dolphins. Manning, Brady, Manning, Brady every season...ouch. 69 Days ago
STAGrad
J-E-T-S SUCK! SUCK! SUCK! 69 Days ago
Willster328
As Skip says, it's the "Eye Test". I don't care about 4 playoff victories or the stats. The eye test tells me that Sanchez is NOT a good quarterback, period. 69 Days ago
FormanBeast
I think Ian and Mark Sanchez should find a motel room quick! The fact is Sanchez is back tracking and NOT progressing. Throw all the numbers you want at me, heck compare his stats to Eli Manning. If you watch the Jets play live, game in and game out, you'll see what an offensive disaster it is AND it starts with the QB. I'm not saying Peyton is the answer to our problems, all i'm saying is Sanchez is not the answer. Also, please give Sanchez some competition! He's too comfortable with a nice starting position, juicy paycheck, and having amazing sleepovers with Kate Upton. 69 Days ago
161 Days ago
68 Days ago
161 Days ago
68 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago
69 Days ago